For the attention of the inner sanctum of the Absurdish Liberation Army.

Dear non-gender specific individuals,

Now the transparent Revolution is well under way, I think our thoughts ought to turn to a post revolutionary numbering system.

The  problem  with all numbering systems used up  to this date is that  they all stem from the same beginnings, and although different societies have used  different bases for their numbers like a base of 60 in ancient Babylon, the almost universal  use of the decimal system used in engineering, and transactions now, or the binary system used in computing, it seems to me the presumptions  that came with  the first  known examples of  people using  numbers has never been questioned. This I propose has lead to a fundamental misunderstanding of the patterns within the numbering system which will not be challenged properly until we set up a new system of numbering which does not have these assumptions written into its very structure.

We have to remember the first known use of a numbering system had a specific purpose which was to record property. This system developed in ancient Iraq was for the specific purpose of quantifying property and recording transactions of a financial nature.

The sender would insert a number of stones in a ball of clay when sending sheep to another party.

The recipient would break the clay open and be able to check the number of sheep he received was the same as the stones in the clay, and in this way would know if any sheep had been lost in transit. The Numbers we use today developed from this system when signs started to be written on the outside of the clay to signify how many  stones were held within it.

This is the problem with our numbering systems because they are all developed from that original. They have in them a culture which inherently wishes to quantify the world. Is it any wonder with this system developed for the needs of the owning classes, that it produces societies which are materialist in nature? Systems which block together like things, without any reference to individuality so that they can be owned and used by unscrupulous individuals?  Yes Accountants!

A system which ratifies all the worst excesses of ownership. Think about it, every problem humanity has today is down to accounting. You can’t do this, have that, or spend your time enjoying life, because the system which is all about ownership and accountants says you can’t afford it.

You see this is the problem with using a system that has been developed for accountancy. It is inherently materialistic and reductive. It’s only interested in owner ship. Think of this simple example; John has two apples, he tales two more, how many apple has John? Answer four.

Where is the Morality?

I hope you can see in this equation how the insidious culture of the accountant is almost imperceptibly introduced to our children so that it will alter their entire consciousness!

If John has two Apples why would he need more?

Notice there is no means of referencing in the equation the possible hurt John might be causing through his actions, From where did he take the Apples, we can now we start thinking about it see how it creates an agenda where a person with power is enabled to just take what they wish whenever they wish without reference to a possible old lady who now her apples have been taken by the usurper John will have to go without!

When we look at the world and the exploitation of the corporations run by accountants of the third world, we can see why this simple propaganda done in the early days of schooling is a system they find so important to push onto us, if we are to rid ourselves of this inherent misconception that leads to so much suffering we need a new holistic maths not based on ownership!

Yours

Kevin Bevis Junior the twenty seventh point three point two five recurring.